Comments on: Health Reform

By: thomaserossi

thomaserossi — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

“It’s called …
“It’s called solidarity…”

Really? Sweden lost Malmo to a bunch a backwards, hatemongering Muslim fanatics and your government arrests people who speak out against them and YOU have the gawl to claim moral highground of solidarity? you Libtard. Your country is rotting from the inside out. You have no solidarity.

Everyone, youtube Search:
Malmo
Sweden Multiculturalism

Notice, I didn’t say type Sweden and Islam. You don’t need to. The Libtards of Sweden destroyed everything.

By: pdqgba

pdqgba — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Anybody else …
Anybody else appreciate the irony of Obambi pointing out that “sure, Fed-Ex and UPS provide better service but the USPS is STILL around, even though it provides lousy service”????

So this should make us ALL want the same government morons in charge there to rule in matters of healthcare????

Feebleminded sheep ….. Lowest Common Denominator for ALL.

Plenty of room on that government bus !!!!

By: teton99

teton99 — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Savings, he writes, …
Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, “as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others” (Journal of the AMA, 6/ 18/ 2008).

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel -health-policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget to Obama (Deadly Doctors, NYP)

By: pdqgba

pdqgba — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Could it maybe be …
Could it maybe be because many of those countries have DECADES worth of extra money available because the US provided an umbrella shielding them from the USSR so they were able to devote the surplus to pampering themselves????

By: pdqgba

pdqgba — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Maybe also because …
Maybe also because they don’t do squat even now toward developing and researching NEW medical technologies because companies in the EVIL old capitalist US carry that load???.

Countries and individuals who are smug and complacent because they get to drink from “wells dug by others” are contemptable (or maybe just liberals—but I repeat myself).

By: AtlasObjectivist

AtlasObjectivist — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Whipper is typical …
Whipper is typical liberal fare – “the populace’s rational selfish interest” – in other words – the nanny state knows what is best for all you rednecks in the fly over states.

By the way Whipper, don’t try and pretend like you have any understanding of a capitalism or Rand by twisting her words to fit your confused argument for ObamaCare.

By: AtlasObjectivist

AtlasObjectivist — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

There are many …
There are many solutions available to reform healthcare. Why is it the radical socialist loons always want the government to take over? Why, in their twisted communist mentality, is the government nanny state always the first and best solution? When in fact, it is proven to be the route of failure and an unproductive repressive society.

Don’t take my word for it, try going in to get your drivers license renewed. Not a lot of rocket science required in this matter.

By: albermarle19

albermarle19 — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

A large portion of …
A large portion of the working ppl in the U.K. are also DEPENDENT on their gov. run healthcare JOB! You’ve created a monster that will never be slayed!

By: albermarle19

albermarle19 — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

Blah-blah-blah….. …
Blah-blah-blah……BULLSHIT!
Ppl want the gov. out of their lives,PERIOD!
Taking over healthcare will disrupt everyones lives.Reform of some sort is needed. Obama has FAILED in explaining any portion of the current bill,maybe because he doesn’t have a clue as to what’s in it!

By: Whippersnapper7

Whippersnapper7 — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:06:12 +0000

If it could be …
If it could be objectively determined that having socialized medicine were in the populace’s rational selfish interest, might there then be a moral ground for it? If it could be shown that a truly free market system were wasteful and economically inefficient and that socialized medicine made sense, might there then be a moral ground for it? What if, in reality, it’s impossible for people to keep from initiating physical force as a result of an objective metaphysical shortage of resources?